The Virtual Pastor: Following a person, or a personality?

Recently I wrote an article on the subject of the Virtual Church (which you should read before moving forward with this post to see where I am coming from on certain points) and even at the time of writing it I had already been keen on future related posts. I received some interesting feedback as a result and I suspect there is more to come. Nonetheless, it would be unjust to consider that topic while overlooking the virtual pastor, who is by default a component of the virtual-church.

The virtual pastor is not a colorful vector image like those seen in computer-generated animations. Instead, he is the man whose Bible teaching is broadcasted from a church service to another predetermined location, typically a building with ample seating capacity. It is there that a congregation of believers gather infront of a screen to watch the message being given, thus forming a satellite church in the least flattering sense, if not better expressed as church via satellite.

This is a new form of pastoring, one that is hardly compatible with the biblical image of shepherding sheep. A pastor that is not present to tend the sheep is tantamount to a church not present to follow the pastor. Both are a contradiction in terms and defy the nature of their definitions (the church is a gathering; the shepherd is with his sheep).

Virtual methods may work well when they are employed by corporate America, but their regular usage in ministry only perpetuates an already unhealthy church mentality. After all, how should we expect congregants to perceive God’s design for his church when their pastor can serve them through the air waves? Or worse yet, when his job is perceived only to be the delivering of a message, the more common view of a pastor these days?

It all fails to model the personal aspect of a connected body for church life when the closest a congregation can come to their pastor is a digital image viewed from the front row. It goes against the very behavior a pastor would expect from the sheep. At this rate, a congregant may think it just as beneficial to skip service and watch online from the comfort of home. At least they’ll save on gas consumption.

This article is not a rebuke to the pastors or ministries that are making use of technology where there is no flesh-and-blood alternative and as a temporary solution to a logistical problem. I do however find much fault with, and no reason for, a pastor who broadcasts himself to another location. A church must have its own resident teaching pastor. As we will see in a future post, the virtual pastor really isn’t a pastor at all according to Biblical terms. I question both the means employed to reach this end, and the end itself.

Because this topic is rather vast in scope, I will be posting the article in a few or more segments as a mini series. No matter how tightly I may try to write it, putting everything in one post would be too long, or incomplete at best.

Following are some of the issues I intend to cover in subsequent posts. I welcome your suggestions as well.

1. The Biblical definition and function of a pastor

2. The definition and application of ‘virtual’ in ministry

3. The biblical incompatibility of the ‘virtual’ nature with the living nature of church

4. The ethical and practical problems that ensue from a ‘virtual’ ministry

5. The justifications given by some to support ‘virtual’ ministry

6. Better alternatives to the broadcasted satellite church

Advertisements

7 responses to “The Virtual Pastor: Following a person, or a personality?

  1. Hey bro,
    It is a valid point you bring up. What about if a church service is conducted in a separate location with their own worship and then segues into the satellite link? Each church has their own supporting Pastor’s even a main Pastor. Is it possible that it could be hindering the work God may want to do through the Pastor’s that are the leaders in each individual church? Just reflecting on the setup around here. We meet at the main church but I could see us even conducting a service in our homes and then turning to the satellite for the lesson, then discussing it right after. I could see how that could work but what would be the downside? Maybe that, that group would get into some strange doctrine? Just curious, I suppose that will be to come. LOL

    • Well, that still leaves the problem of a non-existent, flesh and blood, resident teaching pastor. We’ll talk more about this in the next post on the virtual pastor, but suffice it to say that I can’t see any reason, neither biblically nor practically, why every church shouldn’t have it’s own. As a friend of mine so aptly said in response to my post, why not just find the best bible teacher in the world and pump him in by video to every church in the world? My point and position on the matter is that there is a difference between bible teacher and pastor. The person teaching the congregation should be the person pastoring it also. If he is not present to even know his sheep, how can he tend them and teach them effectively? But I think you hit that point too in your comment. God does want to do a work through the pastors present with the flock. One of those guys should be teaching the group. I would love to hear the reason why this isn’t the case though….

  2. Pingback: A voice crying in the Wordpress, or least wanting to! « Welcome to uThinkology

  3. Well I do know one reason they went with the satellite churches, doing more with less. They were able to take the money and use it to build a school instead of a bigger sanctuary. Weren’t too keen on the idea of a 5,000 seat sanctuary also. Yet the satellite has continued to grow, not sure if it’s a good thing. There’s even a satellite church in the Keys. I do see the dangers of everyone looking to one man but then we do see Moses with a great deal of responsibility that needed to split the burden with many. Granted this thought process if handled the wrong way could be like how the Catholic church as become, the pope is holy and we will hear from him instead of looking to the Bible for direct revelation from God and His holy Spirit. I would say I’m on the fence about it though. I see both sides, maybe not the negatives as much as the positives….since I haven’t heard the disadvantages much yet. Lol….but I anticipate I will soon?

  4. Well Mark you know that we do find video congregations in the bible! see Revelations 13:15 scary!!

  5. Pingback: The Virtual Church, Part One: Where is Modern Technology Leading the Church? | Welcome to uThinkology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s